|
Looking Forward to 2006
Happy New Year!
I don’t think there is any industry as exciting as Health Care.
As we brace for the New Year, I am sure we are planning on how to counter decreases in revenue, while the uninsured market increases, and at the same time determining how we brace for the continued growth of consumer driven health plans.
Our Professional lives are never boring! HFMA is a wonderful resource to fully understand the implications of the on-going revenue cycle and supply chain management issues and opportunities. We also hope that we are providing a resource at the local Greater St. Louis Chapter level.
Our Holiday Program and Reception in December was an opportunity to gain some education while having some fun. In addition it was an opportune time to recognize members who have achieved excellence as members. I would like to thank our Sponsor, Vendors, Program Committee and Social Committee for the awesome job in putting together this event.
As we enter into the New Year, we at the local Chapter are planning for the future of the chapter. Shortly, we will be requesting you to nominate and vote on individuals for leadership positions at the local level. The Board appreciates your input in this process.
I also continue to encourage your feedback about your membership in HFMA If I can be of assistance in any way, please email me at Sheila_Washington@ssmhc.com.
I wish each of you success in this New Year and look forward to networking with you at future events.
Sincerely,
Sheila K. Washington
President
[back to top]

Highlights from the Holiday Program
The Greater St. Louis Chapter’s Holiday Program was held on Wednesday, December 7, 2005 at the Doubletree Hotel & Conference Center in Chesterfield, MO.
The conference opened with presentations by Ms. Laureen Tanner, CEO, and Dr. Nicolas Holekamp, Medical Director, of Ranken Jordan, A Pediatric Specialty Hospital. They discussed the transformation of Ranken Jordan from a skilled nursing facility to a pediatric specialty hospital, and the program that allowed them to build a state-of-the-art facility that just recently opened in Maryland Heights, Missouri. The attendees supported Ranken Jordan’s cause by responding to a request for toys and gifts for the kids in the hospital.
Then, Karen Everhart, Greater St. Louis Chapter Secretary, enlightened the audience with highlights of her HFMA Exchange trip to Scotland this summer. Her slides of the health care issues in the U.K. let us know we’re not alone, and pictures from her trip took the audience right across the ocean!
The conference portion of the afternoon was concluded with awards given to chapter members for their achievements and service to HFMA. Awardees included Sheila Washington, Joe Salmo, Gerald Bamberger, Jim Arcipowski, Bernice Marquart, Bill Colletta, Glenn Kraft, Rose Dunn, Steve Gosik, Jim Hill and Chris Buckley.
Finally, the evening’s entertainment began with a reception, an awesome dinner and was rounded out with an opportunity to play Las Vegas-style games. Fun was had by all! It was a great way to network, get caught up on old friendships and do a little “gambling” – the kind that doesn’t hurt the bank account! (See pictures below.)
Many thanks to the event sponsor, Blue Cross Blue Shield, to all the wonderful sponsors that donated prizes for the raffle, to CACi for donating their time and equipment for the games, and to all the many HFMA members that planned each portion of the event!

[back to top]


The New Frontier of
Automated Charity Processing
Bruce Nelson, Vice President
bruce.nelson@searchamerica.com
Matt Rashilla, Eastern Region Manager
matt.rashilla@searchamerica.com
In some ways Revenue Cycle Management has not changed substantially in the last five years. But, when you are talking discounts for the uninsured, charity processing and collection practices, everything has changed.
In fact, virtually every hospital in the nation has changed their credit and collection policy related to charity within the last 18 months to provide better guidelines for charity qualification. These revisions have allowed hospitals to confidently answer “yes” when asked “Does your institution have a clear policy related to provision of charity care?” But, the real question that needs to be asked is this: “Is the organization’s published policy applied in a non-discriminatory way and will it hold up to outside scrutiny?”
Unfortunately for many of the nation’s hospitals, the answer has to be “no.” After all, if you think about it, you will realize that it is impossible to manually process charity accounts and maintain this process as non-discriminatory. This is true for two reasons. First, hospitals attempting to process uninsured/underinsured discounts cannot do this without up-to-date patient financial information. Second, the time it takes to get up-to-date financial information on patients via manual processing is time-prohibitive.
As a result, many hospitals have changed their credit and collection policies, but are unable to properly adhere to the policy because of these related operational challenges:
-
Financial counselors are unable to verify information
-
Strict adherence to the policy is a time-consuming effort
-
Some patients are reluctant to participate in the qualification process
-
Extensive charity follow-up delays financial clearance of accounts
-
It is difficult to apply charity policies objectively
-
Recent lawsuits and media reports have put hospitals on the defensive
-
Many hospitals already have patients saying they do not have a social security number just so they can qualify for federal coverage under section 1011. It will be good to screen for these patients
Automating the charity screening process addresses each of these operational challenges using data and tools that map a patient’s actual financial profile against the defined financial criteria in the organization’s charity policy to determine charity eligibility.
This automation provides additional benefit for marginal accounts that don’t quite meet the charity rules by reducing collection expenses for accounts with little or no ability to pay.
Example:
-
Retrospective analysis of charity write-offs for a health care system. Review consisted of accounts written off to charity over the past year
-
Results showed that the hospital was not very successful in manually classifying accounts for charity
-
41% of patients accounts (76% of the total charges) had a “High” likelihood of paying (>$8.4M)
-
28% of accounts had a “Medium” likelihood to pay
-
31% of accounts had a “Low” likelihood of paying
-
59% of the accounts had a credit line which would cover the balance owed (>$6.5M)
So what is the solution for the nation’s hospitals when tackling this difficult issue?
-
You need a system that screens for Charity, uninsured and underinsured discounts
-
This automated system must evaluate patient financial need
-
The new technology should ensure non-discriminatory compliance
-
Must have the ability to calculate discounts automatically
-
Estimates household size, income and assets
-
Have the ability to support individual charity rules, customized applications/forms
-
Online Reconciliation Reports that will help them understand the volume of charity processing completed
-
Do all of this using the most accurate financial data and information available to minimize errors
[back to top]

Making the Most of Performance Reviews
Janice Halenza
With 2006 right around the corner, you can hardly pick up a magazine without encountering a “Best of 2005” list for music, movies or books. It’s the time of year when most of us consider the previous 12 months and make plans for the coming ones. Similarly, many healthcare organizations conduct their own “year in review” by providing employee performance assessments.
While few staff members eagerly anticipate annual reviews, most find them helpful: In a OfficeTeam survey, 77 percent of professionals said they consider these meetings valuable, while 40 percent see them as very beneficial. In fact, when conducted well, appraisals can be positive experiences that motivate employees to reach their potential and achieve their professional goals. Following are some suggestions to help you make these meetings as productive as possible.
Establish the Right Criteria
Many organizations provide evaluation forms to managers for reviews. If your organization does not have a formal document, talk to your human resources manager to find out what guidelines you should follow. Specific evaluation criteria will vary depending on the position — a patient registration clerk wouldn’t be evaluated for her accuracy in billing clients, for example, unless this was part of the job description. Still, there are some general factors that can be considered for all staff members. Here are some key focus areas:
-
Competency: Think about how well the individual performs basic job duties. For instance, does your front desk coordinator interact well with patients, and process their forms quickly and accurately?
-
Teamwork: Does the employee have positive working relationships with others, and does she offer assistance freely?
-
Initiative: How frequently does the person volunteer for new projects and come up with solutions to issues before coming to you for advice?
-
Soft skills: Is the employee an effective communicator, verbally and in writing?
-
Ethics: Does an employee handle confidential information with professionalism and discretion?
Make it a Two-Way Street
You’ll lower an employee’s anxiety – and perhaps increase his receptiveness to your feedback – if you ask him to complete a self-appraisal before the review. This provides him with the opportunity to weigh in, and gives you a window into his assessment of his own performance, enabling you to better prepare for the discussion. Perhaps you’ll also be reminded of an accomplishment you forgot – maybe he worked on a major project outside of his current job description. You also might want to solicit feedback from coworkers or other managers he’s worked with; positive comments balance any constructive criticism you may offer.
Avoid an “ambush” appraisal. Nothing you say during a formal review should come as a surprise to an employee. Providing ongoing feedback ensures that employees can immediately correct mistakes and consistently build their strengths.
Provide Constructive Criticism
The most challenging part of the review may be bringing up areas that need improvement. Begin on a positive note. Let the employee know what she’s done well and what, in particular, impresses you most about her work. After talking about her strong points, shift the conversation to discuss areas where she can grow. Give specific examples when mentioning weaknesses, and discuss how she can improve upon these areas in the following year. For instance, you might say to an employee who needs to broaden their skill set, “While you have your basic job duties down, I’m hoping you’ll expand your responsibilities in the next year.” Then provide a few examples of the types of projects you have in mind.
When offering constructive criticism, make sure you’re having a conversation, not giving a lecture. By encouraging an open dialogue, you may find out about critical factors that affect her ability to do her job. For example, maybe deadlines have slipped because the employee is covering for a coworker who left.
Next, establish goals for the employee to help her improve future performance. These should be specific, attainable tasks, and you will both need to agree on a timeline for achieving them. Make sure to solicit your employee’s suggestions on how she can improve as well. If she needs stronger computer skills, for example, perhaps there is an appropriate class available. Be sure to check in throughout the year to ensure each staff member is on track; sometimes priorities or job responsibilities change, and goals must be adjusted accordingly.
Give employees a written copy of their performance reviews, along with a memo listing the goals, how success will be measured and a timeline for completion. This way, there will be no question about what’s expected in the next year and staff members have a guide to track their progress.
Finally, keep in mind that in addition to assessing past performance, appraisal meetings are an ideal opportunity to consider future objectives. All healthcare professionals can benefit from an action plan for moving ahead in their careers. This is the time to encourage employees to stretch their abilities and establish goals that will improve their overall job satisfaction.
Performance evaluations are an opportunity to reinforce expectations and communicate with your staff about their career objectives. By preparing carefully for these meetings and offering constructive feedback throughout the year, you and your employees will get the most out of the appraisal process.
Performance Appraisals: What Not to Do
Following are some common performance review pitfalls and how to avoid them:
-
Winging it. Instead, prepare in advance for individual meetings with employees. Doing so will encourage you to evaluate staff based on the same standards.
-
Failing to consult others. If your team members work regularly with people in other areas, tap these colleagues for additional feedback prior to the meeting. You may be surprised by what you hear — pleasantly and otherwise.
-
Keeping employees in the dark. Nothing in the performance review should come as a major surprise to employees. Let them know what will be discussed, how much time to set aside for the meeting and how you would like them to prepare for it.
-
Failing to follow through. Make sure you and your employees agree on key objectives for the coming year, and establish checkpoints to assess their progress in the months ahead. |
Janice Halenza is the division director of OfficeTeam Healthcare Group in St. Louis. The OfficeTeam Healthcare Group specializes in placing temporary administrative professionals exclusively in the healthcare industry, ranging from medical secretaries and receptionists to coding and billing specialists. For more information, contact us at (314) 588-9818.
[back to top]


A Unique Approach To Providing Services To The Uninsured
Pete Strauss
Most hospitals are losing significant amounts of money providing care to the uninsured. Among the reasons for this are the following:
-
The uninsured and underinsured show up in outpatient and emergency departments in disproportionate numbers.
-
Hospitals are in a difficult situation. Turning away uninsured patients poses ethical, regulatory, public relations, and financial conundrums that all hospital executives are familiar with.
-
Collecting billed charges is next to impossible. Annually millions of dollars in writeoffs result from uncollectibles.
-
Public attention is now being focused on the fact that hospitals typically base charges to the uninsured on retail charge masters while the "real price" of those services are said to be the discounted charges negotiated in the managed care market place. This opens hospitals up to the charge of "subsidizing insured patients on the backs of the uninsured". This is of course an absurd allegation since the vast majority of billed charges are written off. Nevertheless, this does not negate the public perception of hospitals taking advantage of its uninsured patients.
-
What to do? Here is a brief outline of an approach to dealing with this problem. This is only one suggestion and should be used in conjunction with others made in previous Health Planning Solutions’ newsletters.
-
Hospitals should lower their charges to uninsured patients consistent with the average commercial price (including average discounts provided to managed care companies, insurers, etc.)
-
Hospitals should negotiate with their medical staffs to lower prices to the uninsured consistent with the average discounts they negotiate in the managed care environment.
-
Hospitals should issue "Provider Discount Cards" to uninsured patients when they appear for services. This allows uninsured patients to access these services at the lowered hospital charges and at the negotiated market rates for physician and ancillary services.
-
Hospitals can charge a monthly fee for participation in the program. This would not be an insurance project but simply an access fee. If the hospital is so inclined, revenue from payment of this fee could be used against future service charges. (There are a number of national companies that have successfully used this model in selling access to discounts to a number of different health care providers including hospitals, physicians, dentists, optometrists, and pharmacies.)
-
This approach can be integrated with current features of your program to provide services and collect charges from the uninsured and with other features such as credit arrangements which allows for immediate collection of a portion of your charges.
For further information or to comment on this newsletter, please contact Pete Strauss at pstrauss@healthplanningsolutions.com or call 314-583-9023.
[back to top]

Legal Lines:
ASPECTS OF THE NEW BANKRUPTCY ACT
Gerald J. Bamberger, Attorney at Law
The recently enacted Bankruptcy Abuse, Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 became effective on Monday, October 17, 2005. The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri reported 3,300 cases under the existing act were filed in the month of September and an expected similar number to be filed prior to October 17, 2005. The majority of those cases were filed under Chapter 7. The writer anticipates a substantial decrease in bankruptcy filings after October 17, 2005 until the pending cases are initially processed and attorneys become familiar with the substantial changes in the new act.
Due to the inclusion of a means test in the new act, it is anticipated that a substantial majority of consumer cases filed after October 17, 2005 will be under Chapter 13 rather than Chapter 7. One of the goals of the act is to have debtors pay a larger percent of their obligations under Chapter 13. For creditors to be paid under a Chapter 13 case, they must file a claim with the Bankruptcy Court. However, in many instances, creditors are improperly listed on the debtor's schedules or the notice is set to a lockbox where the information is not acted upon, resulting in lost revenue to the creditor.
Fortunately, the new act has established a National Creditor Registration Service at which creditors can list the address where they want all notices to be sent. The website is www.ncrsuscourts.com and the telephone number is 877-837-3424. This notice provision applies only to cases filed after October 17, 2005.
It is suggested that creditors and collection agencies register with the service in care of a person designated to monitor all bankruptcy notices. That person would then be able to stop all collection activity upon receipt of the notice, thereby complying with the automatic stay provision of the act. If accounts have been forwarded to a collection agency or attorney, that person can then notify the collection agency or attorney of the bankruptcy. More importantly, in Chapter 13 cases, claims will then be filed in all cases. Also, where statutory medical liens have been filed on a pending personal injury claim, a motion for relief from the automatic stay can be filed in the bankruptcy court authorizing payment of the claim out of any recovery. As many creditors do not receive proper notice or fail to file claims, it is anticipated that filing creditors may ultimately receive a larger percent of their claims in completed Chapter 13 cases.
One of the requirements of the new bankruptcy act is to require debtors to participate in a credit counseling program with approved agencies. [Section 109(h)] But the act also requires creditors, their agencies and attorneys to work with and negotiate with such agencies in order to attempt resolution of outstanding debts. If a creditor, its agencies or attorneys unreasonably refuse to negotiate with such credit counseling agencies, its claim in the bankruptcy estate can be reduced by the court up to twenty percent (20%). Section 502(k) of the act states
".... that an offer by the debtor made at least sixty (60) days before the date of filing of the petition in bankruptcy which provides for payment of at least sixty percent (60%) of the amount of the debt over a period not to exceed the repayment period of the loan or a reasonable extension thereof and if not non-dischargeable may be so reduced if creditor is unreasonable in its rejection."
This appears to be a guide but each case would have to decided on its own particular facts in view of the requirement that the creditor must act unreasonably to have its bankruptcy claim reduced.
The writer further recommends to collection agencies and attorneys that they obtain written authorization from the debtor to communicate with the debtor's credit counseling agency to comply with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
[back to top]

January Social Event
Please join your HFMA chapter as we celebrate absolutely nothing but a good time and being together. There will be prizes, networking, and some HFMA memories to add to those we already have.
Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Time: 5:30 p.m. until we decide to go home
Place: Syberg’s
2430 Old Dorsett Road (right off of Highway 270)
(314) 785-0481
www.sybergsdorsett.com
Special Thanks to CCI for donating the following great prizes:
-
$50.00 Gift Certificate to The Elephant Bar
-
$50.00 Gift Certificate to Syberg’s / Helen Fitzgerald’s
-
$50.00 Gift Certificate to Bristol’s Seafood Grille
[back to top]

2006 OPPS Update
&
Are You Coding For Quality?
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
8:30 am – 3:00 pm
Doubletree Hotel & Conference Center
16625 Swingley Ridge Rd.
Chesterfield, MO 63017
National Speakers:
Jugna Shah, MPH
President & Founder-Nimitt Consulting
Ian L. Diener, MD, MBA, FAAFP
Chief Medical Officer-HP3, Inc.
contact:
David Cheese Manager, Managed Care Contracting
SSM Health Care-St. Louis
1173 Corporate Lake Dr.
St. Louis, MO 63132
Phone 314-989-2099
Fax 314-989-2264
[back to top]

Board Meeting Calendar
| DATE |
TIME |
PLACE / OTHER EVENT |
COMMITTEE UPDATES |
| 2/17/06 |
2 - 3:30 pm |
SSM Corporate - Room B |
Programs
Social
Membership
Placement/ Communications
Archives
Constitution & Bylaws |
| 4/21/06 |
2 - 3:30 pm |
SSM Corporate - Room B |
Programs
Social
Membership
Sponsorship/Newsletter/ Nominating
Yerger
Audit
Awards |
| 5/24/06 |
Lunch |
TBA
Spring Conference |
ALL COMMITTEES |
Note: Committee Updates are to be given by the Chair and/or Co-Chair. Any committee can address updates at any Board Meeting.
[back to top]

Calendar of Programs and Events
For information on programs, contact Programs Chair Teri Reger at teri_reger@ssmhc.com.
For social events, contact Social Chair Lisa Haug at hauglm@senexco.com.
|